A Living Record of the Polyvagal Controversy

Produced by Hearth Science, whose own proposed resolution is listed under Proposed Resolutions. Editorial standards

Last updated November 12, 2026 · v0.1

For clinicians

What the debate means for practice

Most clinicians learned polyvagal theory through its clinical interpreters rather than the primary papers. The debate is about those papers.

This section separates what is established from what is testable and what is a framework, using the same labels as the Record.

Established

Measured and replicated

[To be written from the agreed dispute map.]

Testable

Predicted, not yet tested

[To be written from the agreed dispute map.]

Framework

Organizing, not directly testable

[To be written from the agreed dispute map.]

What remains in dispute is listed in the Record.

With clients

Discussing the debate

[Guidance on discussing the debate with clients who have encountered polyvagal language. Draft pending.]

Documents by Hearth Science

Clinician guides

Both documents download directly. No sign-up is required.

Guide · PDF · [pages]

The Clinician's Guide to the Polyvagal Controversy

[Description and contents pending.]

Briefing · PDF · v1.2 [release pending review]

Breaking the Stasis: A Structured Briefing for Clinicians

Excerpts from the preprint, each set beneath a clinical essay on what it means for practice. Version matches the preprint.

  1. The sensory side
  2. The differentiated vagus
  3. Pervading neurochemistry as the third dimension
  4. Passage between danger and life threat

Psychotherapy Networker

Articles

[Issue, date]

[Title of the polyvagal standoff article]

Natureza Gabriel Kram · Psychotherapy Networker

Read at the Networker →

Forthcoming

[Second article]

Follow the record

An email when the record changes. Optional. Nothing on the record requires it.