A Living Record of the Polyvagal Controversy

Produced by Hearth Science, whose own proposed resolution is listed under Proposed Resolutions. Editorial standards

Last updated November 12, 2026 · v0.1

The Record

The map of the disagreement

The Record holds each disputed claim in wording both principals approve, each principal's position in his own words, each one's reply to the other, and what evidence each says would settle the question.

Agreement is not required on the answers. It is required on the questions.

Status

In preparation

No disputes are listed yet.

A draft list is not published. Disputes appear here once both principals have approved their wording.

Method

Six steps, in order

01

Agree on the questions

Both principals approve the list of disputed claims and the wording of each.

02

State each position

Each principal states his position on each claim, in his own words.

03

Reply

Each principal responds to the other's statement.

04

Classify the disagreement

Evidence, definition or interpretation. Each kind is settled differently.

05

Name what would settle it

Each principal states what result would change his view.

06

Test

Claims that turn on evidence become testable claims, with predictions stated in advance.

Dispute status

Agreed by both
Both principals have approved the claim's wording.
Under test
A test agreed in advance is under way.
Settled
The agreed test has reported. Dated, with both principals' responses.

Evidence status

Established
Measured and replicated.
Testable
Makes a prediction that has not yet been tested.
Framework
An organizing claim that is not itself directly testable.

[Definitions to confirm against the clinician briefing.]

Draft only, not public: the layout each dispute page will use once disputes are agreed.

Dispute page template →

Follow the record

An email when the record changes. Optional. Nothing on the record requires it.